tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post5522779062522024529..comments2024-03-01T13:51:47.721+05:30Comments on Reality, one bite at a time: U.S. overshadows G-20 summit with Iran nuclear hypeSiddharth Varadarajanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07721228307097170092noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-54678883199620058822009-09-27T19:18:09.087+05:302009-09-27T19:18:09.087+05:30Siddharth, I'm afraid your articles are scalin...Siddharth, I'm afraid your articles are scaling new heights of bias every day---incredible though that might sound. You have become a shill for China, Iran, and any cause that you perceive as anti-American, despite the facts too that the forces you back are, almost invariably, also anti-Indian. <br /><br />It is difficult to see how you can live with the hypocrisy of backing a despotic Islamic theocracy that suppresses its own citizens brutally, but I suppose practice makes perfect. You have, after all, been at this game a long time. If your articles and viewpoints weren't so laughable, the situation might actually have been sad.RSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-13478237009532489602009-09-27T18:03:32.556+05:302009-09-27T18:03:32.556+05:30" But Tehran withdrew its adherence to the ar..." But Tehran withdrew its adherence to the arrangement four years later, in retaliation against UN sanctions" Mr. Varadarajan, if your analysis is to have any semblance of credibility, please at least try to get your facts right. Iran did not and cannot "withdraw" adherence to the modification to the subsidiary agreement as the country's reps had, through an exchange of letters in 2003, modified the subsidiary agreement. <br /><br />Your shrill and ridiculously biased reporting requires the willing suspension of objective judgment and, perhaps, you ought to find a new medium such as the China Daily for publication of your Goebbelsian gibberishVijay Dandapanihttp://wwwl.vijaydandapani.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-17014477210084880832009-09-26T06:47:30.052+05:302009-09-26T06:47:30.052+05:30While accusing the American media of echoing claim...While accusing the American media of echoing claims by the White House, you seem to be echoing claims by the Iranians -- "the facility is said to be in preliminary stages of construction" -- have you seen it, or taken a trip inside?<br /><br />If the facility is really meant to be for nuclear power, why should the Iranians construct it deep inside a mountain invisible to aerial satellites and resistant to aerial bombing? They claim they have the right to enrich uranium for nuclear power. Then why not build a new power plant in full view of the world? How many Indian power plants are hid underneath a mountain? Why wait for the so-called 180-day limit to inform the IAEA?<br /><br />This is serious stuff. I hope you do not let your reflexive anti-Americanism cloud your reporting on a case of nuclear proliferation.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18116371126686658668noreply@blogger.com