tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post4059048426245792191..comments2024-03-01T13:51:47.721+05:30Comments on Reality, one bite at a time: A reminder from terrorists: We don’t want India-Pakistan talksSiddharth Varadarajanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07721228307097170092noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-75882558755697892132010-02-19T18:23:42.588+05:302010-02-19T18:23:42.588+05:30Well Siddharth. According to your article India go...Well Siddharth. According to your article India got the attack that it should have been expected when it offered to talk to Pakistan. Indians were doing just fine (over 14 months without a major attack) until the government went and changed a policy that was working. You might argue that it was kowtowing to the Pakistani terrorists, but I am sure the victims of Pune would have preferred that to the latest orgy of India-Pakistan bhai-bhai. <br /><br />By the way, are you going to be as hard on the Pakistani government for going out of its way to protect the perpetrators of Mumbai as you have been on Modi for Gujarat? Or is justice for victims of Mumbai an acceptable sacrifice on the alter of India-Pakistan reconciliation?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-89472754237073729152010-02-14T18:08:28.787+05:302010-02-14T18:08:28.787+05:30The argument presented here is mutually contradict...The argument presented here is mutually contradictory. There are two sides. One wants peace. Other wants war and declares it. What should the other side do then? Should it not defend itself? <br /><br />They went for war. We went for peace. The inevitable happened. They won in taking out a terrorist attack, and we should tackle it by more inaction?<br /><br />What is proposed here is a recipe for self-destruction.Pankaj Saksenahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08754257010028071184noreply@blogger.com