tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post3132633376277134747..comments2024-03-01T13:51:47.721+05:30Comments on Reality, one bite at a time: That communal BJP CD - A transcriptSiddharth Varadarajanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07721228307097170092noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-48057007875060844952009-02-15T07:28:00.000+05:302009-02-15T07:28:00.000+05:30Thank you for showing us the reality.Thank you for showing us the reality.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-466343518815520212007-05-31T08:01:00.000+05:302007-05-31T08:01:00.000+05:30has the overall percentage of muslims in India rem...has the overall percentage of muslims in India remained the same or changed since Independence? <BR/><BR/>Population explosion in India is an issue of literacy and its quite obvious that states with lowest literacy are the ones with quite a significant amount of insecurity in their religious beliefs. <BR/><BR/>Beyond that is religion really needed for goodness to prevail in a Modern civilized society? Is just being spiritual enough? Those comparing Indian Muslims to the Broader world of Muslims should think again in my humble opinion.<BR/><BR/>best wishes <BR/>arifAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-63013934318844430222007-04-14T19:38:00.000+05:302007-04-14T19:38:00.000+05:30This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-25946113372556915572007-04-13T12:13:00.000+05:302007-04-13T12:13:00.000+05:30Please read www.jihadwatch.org and www.faithfreedo...Please read www.jihadwatch.org and www.faithfreedom.org<BR/><BR/>Mr. Siddharth Varadarajan - Would you please debate Koranic scholars like Mr Robert Spencer about your views of Islam? He is available at www.jihadwatch.org.<BR/><BR/>Mr. Ali Sina (Iranian ex-Muslim) has a open public challenge with anybody who can disprove what he says about Muslims and Islam on his web site. Please go and debate him on his site at www.faithfreedom.orgAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-73805116277375636722007-04-13T11:47:00.000+05:302007-04-13T11:47:00.000+05:30such comments are a reality check. to think Indian...such comments are a reality check. to think Indians would have reached a certain level of maturity and understand the futility of this misplaced hatred is naive.<BR/>we just love to hate. the comments make me realise that we are not only ignorant but vicious and dangerous peopleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-39229925640603912502007-04-12T13:37:00.000+05:302007-04-12T13:37:00.000+05:30Well its all reality and absolute reality. The maj...Well its all reality and absolute reality. The majority is slowly turning into minority and vice-versa.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07651300756408205967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-24944280661995565102007-04-11T13:24:00.000+05:302007-04-11T13:24:00.000+05:30Horrific! To say the least!Horrific! To say the least!Radhahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17019567538933256974noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-22462993171876997572007-04-10T22:04:00.000+05:302007-04-10T22:04:00.000+05:30all those people asking for a script of the things...all those people asking for a script of the things said in churches and jumma prayers , I say they have a right and also ask for the ones in RSS shakas alrites. We r not talking of religious fanatics.<BR/>U dumb people grow up,,, The BJP will the STATE representation of people and to have such a mindset is shame and scary IF ELECTED.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-81293489146338602602007-04-10T21:54:00.000+05:302007-04-10T21:54:00.000+05:30Bharat janto Panto: (BJP)Bajarang Dumb: (BD)Rahul ...Bharat janto Panto: (BJP)<BR/>Bajarang Dumb: (BD)<BR/>Rahul S. Srivastav: (RSS)<BR/>Sensible Hinduja: SH<BR/><BR/> BJP: (to his friends)I’m getting bored lets have some fun. <BR/> BD (comes running in) : bhaiya those people are converting our boy.<BR/>RSS: WHO, Tell we shall punish them appropriately.<BR/> We are men of religion, and shall behave like one, be brave not coward and act justly punish them. <BR/><BR/>SH: ooohh yes, behave like men of religion. Like the last time. Kill the men, and rape women very good representation of my religion. Very good very good.<BR/><BR/>BJP: but BD bhaiya, who did they convert and where. <BR/>BD: on the internet I was reading the blog and I found all of our boys/Girls quoting from Quran. They know more about Quran now than their own scriptures.<BR/><BR/><BR/>BJP: arre dumb bhaiya, they don’t know anything about quran, but its copy paste job from falseinformation/tospeardhatered.com <BR/>heehee i have myself put some false information there to corrupt minds. <BR/><BR/>BJP: Muslims kill cow,, Revenge will be taken kill all those who eat cow.<BR/>BD goes for hunt comes back with Miyan bhai, Munna bhai , Bush, Tony, Manohar and oberia.<BR/><BR/>RSS: abhhee short Circuit BD, why did u bring Bush, Tony manohar and oberia. <BR/>BD: sir they bush and tony were having beef steek @ hotel Taj , manohar and oberia serving them. <BR/>BJP: (now angry) who told u there eating beef?<BR/> BD: hotel waiter manohar who was serving, and hotel owner OBERIA who sells beef steak on the menu.<BR/><BR/>BJP: Release Bush and Tony, they were eating STEAK AND NOT BEEF, it ok for them to eat not Miyan bhai and Munna bhai and Moreover we need to make nuke deals with them and we need their money, WE NEED TO DO BUSSINESS WITH THEM. They are our miabaap. Finish miyan bhai and munna bhai.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-72579664373776388062007-04-10T17:29:00.000+05:302007-04-10T17:29:00.000+05:30To some extent the alleged depictions are true. Fo...To some extent the alleged depictions are true. For example, it is true that there are fundamentalist muslims who beleive that they are following the sunnah of prophet mohammed by abducting hindu women and converting them. Similarly, there are some who think that they are cleansing the land of kufr(arabic word commonly used for denoting wrong/evil/darkness/refusing god) when they convert darulharb to darulislam.<BR/><BR/>However, BJP's attempt to use these things for electoral gains is wrong. <BR/><BR/>- NesakumarAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-55844362274631477992007-04-10T12:51:00.000+05:302007-04-10T12:51:00.000+05:30Enough "reality to bite for a life time" has been ...Enough "reality to bite for a life time" has been given.<BR/><BR/>Would Mr. Sridhar varadarajan bite ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-60685071604610941932007-04-10T11:26:00.000+05:302007-04-10T11:26:00.000+05:30Varada, Thanks for bringing the contents of this o...Varada, <BR/><BR/>Thanks for bringing the contents of this otherwise-obscure-CD to an all India audience by taking so much pain to translate it and publishing it in your "National Newspaper". I appreciate it. <BR/><BR/>In fact, I would think many sensible people would actually nod in agreement, at least at places, instead of fuming all through while reading this transcript. <BR/><BR/>// I hope you would take similar painstaiking effort to translate and report some of the phamplets they distribute in churches and some of the excerpts of the mullahs speech on a Juma prayer meeting. // <BR/><BR/>Actually they did this in UK and a British Channel produced a 6 part documentary also on it. <BR/><BR/>See for yourself what the so so so moderate Mullahs are saying : <BR/><BR/>http://www.sweetness-light.com/archive/youtube-has-uks-undercover-mosque<BR/><BR/>Given this, what would you think the utterings in the hardliner Deobandi mosques of UP would be? They would make the BJP CD depiction an extermely diulted and ridiculously ultra-soft one. <BR/><BR/>Would you care to translate these video transcripts too, dear Varada?ஜடாயுhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03221239000215336928noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-58635686769109646902007-04-10T09:12:00.000+05:302007-04-10T09:12:00.000+05:30Swami Vivekananda's words are ringing true. "Arise...Swami Vivekananda's words are ringing true. "Arise! Awake! And Stop not until the Goal is reached!" Let us wake up and work towards a Hindu India.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-52301296028527868142007-04-10T09:07:00.000+05:302007-04-10T09:07:00.000+05:30More "lies" for you! 3. The Muslim birth rate3.1. ...More "lies" for you! <BR/><BR/>3. The Muslim birth rate<BR/><BR/>3.1. Muslim fertility<BR/><BR/> Is there anything demonstrably intentional about this Islamic demographic expansion? In an article seeking to "explode the myth" of Muslim demographic aggression, journalists Namita Bhandare, Louise Fernandes and Minu Jain themselves admit that according to official surveys, "the disapproval of family planning is highest among Muslims", while "the practice of family planning methods in 1980 was lowest amongst Muslims (only 23% of those surveyed practised it as opposed to 36% Hindus)".[1] They further admit that between 1971 and 1981, "the Hindu population was up by 24.15%, whereas the Muslim population shot up by 30.59%". Further, they give the decline in fertility levels in the same period: 20.1% decline for urban and 20.0% for rural Hindus, 18.5% for urban and 17.3% for rural Muslims. This means that the already lower fertility level of the Hindus is declining faster than that of the Muslims.<BR/><BR/> Let us hear the same indications from an official source: "The total fertility rate (TFR) is 3.4 children per woman. (...) Muslims have considerably higher fertility than any other religious group. Muslim women have a TFR of 4.4, which is 1.1 children higher than the TFR for Hindu women."[2]<BR/><BR/> The implication of these data is that the Muslim rate of growth in percentage of the Indian population will go on increasing. Instead of extrapolating across centuries, we may make a safer prognosis for the next few decades. It is safe to predict that the 2001 census will show another sharp increase in the rate at which Muslims are demographically catching up with the Hindu majority. It is then that the full effect of the birth control campaigns of the 1960s and 70s will become visible. Given the higher Hindu participation in the birth control effort of the 1960s and 70s, we must now be witnessing a cumulative effect, of a proportionately smaller number of Hindu mothers (born in that period) having in their turn each a smaller number of children than the proportionately larger number of Muslim mothers, on average. <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>3.2. The economic explanation<BR/><BR/> Unable to refute the Hindu Revivalist perception of a visible and increasing Muslim demographic growth, the journalists retreat to their next line of defence: they admit the fact of Muslim demographic expansion but disconnect it from Muslim identity. They offer as their explanation that it has nothing to do with Islam as such nor with any aggressive designs: it is all due to Muslim poverty, "the reason has to do with economics and not with religion".[3] This is the old Marxist cliché: reduce everything to economic factors. It is still the most common explanation for the higher Muslim growth rate: the average Indian Muslim is poorer and less educated than the average Hindu, and poverty and low education both happen to lead to a higher birth rate.<BR/><BR/> Baljit Rai, a retired police officer who was a personal witness to India's failure in containing the rising tide of illegal immigration from Bangladesh, refutes this argument by pointing to the birth rate among Kerala Muslims, who have a high level of education and a relatively high standard of living. Mani Shankar Aiyar had claimed on the basis of statewise figures for the southern states that "Muslim birth rates in all these enlightened states are very much lower than Hindu birth rates in unenlightened states like Uttar Pradesh".[4] However, Rai's closer analysis of the figures shows that the Kerala Muslims have a higher birth-rate than the national Hindu average and even than the Hindu average in poor and backward states like Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan: the population growth (+28.74% for 1981-91) in the Muslim-majority district of Malappuram (with female literacy at 75.22%, far higher than among Hindus in the Hindi belt) is more than twice as high as the average for Kerala (+13.98), and well above the Hindu national average (+23.50).[5]<BR/><BR/> A secularist journalist confirms: "In spite of this 'near total literacy' the population growth rate of Muslims who constitute one-fourth of Kerala's population is as high as 2.3 per cent per year, which is more than even the national PGR [= population growth rate] of 2.11 per annum and is almost double the PGR of Hindus in Kerala itself."[6] <BR/><BR/> The figures for Kerala exemplify a general rule: at any given level of literacy and economic status, Muslims will have a markedly higher birth rate than their Hindu counterparts, even to the extent of having a higher birth rate than Hindus in a lower educational or income bracket. A secularist journalist, Pranay Gupta, estimates that in Hyderabad, which has a large Muslim middle-class, a typical Muslim family has eight children while a Hindu family has four.[7] <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>3.3. The literacy factor<BR/><BR/> Ever since the propagation of birth control among the Hindu masses, rich and literate Muslims have more children than poor and illiterate Hindus -- the religious determinant overrules the economic determinant. This comes out clearly when we compare with the admittedly high growth rate for the Scheduled Castes: "The high growth rate of Muslims, due to poverty, illiteracy etc., is comparable to the growth rate of Scheduled Castes", writes Ashish Bose; but he himself gives the SC growth rate as 31% for the decade 1981-91 against the Muslim growth rate of 32.8%.[8] True, some Muslims fall in the same low-income category as the SCs; but taking into account the Muslim middle-class, some old landed gentry and a lot of guest workers in the Gulf states, the average Muslim income is considerably higher than the average SC income.[9] <BR/><BR/> Likewise, illiteracy is definitely higher among the SCs than among Muslims. And yet, the Muslim growth rate is still 1.8% higher than that of the SCs. "Even after controlling for the level of education among women, religious differentials in fertility persist. Scheduled Caste women have a higher TFR (3.9) than Scheduled Tribe women (3.6) and non-SC/ST women (3.3)"[10] -- all of them considerably less than the Muslim TFR of 4.4.<BR/><BR/> The same is true for the rural-urban differential: just like in other countries, Indian rural couples have a higher fertility (5.7 for Hindus, 6.2 for Muslims) than urban couples (4.2 for Hindus, 4.9 for Muslims), but this secular determinant of fertility is overruled by the religious determinant, for Muslims are more concentrated in the cities but have a higher over-all birth rate nonetheless.[11]<BR/><BR/> Incidentally, the source just cited, Mohan Rao, provides an example of the misplaced confidence with which secularists berate Hindu Revivalists as unreliable, mendacious etc. Though riding a very high horse in his denunciation of "communal propaganda", Rao himself makes a conspicuously counterfactual statement: "The Hindu population increased by 0.71 per cent between 1961-71 and 1971-81. The population of Muslims rose by 0.05 per cent, much less than that of Hindus. (...) the growth rates of Hindus will continue to be higher than those of Muslims."[12] <BR/><BR/> He confuses the figures for the increase in population with the actual population figures. The Hindu growth rate increased between 1971 and 1981, from 23.71% to 24.42% (a finding on which Mani Shankar Aiyar builds a similarly mistaken case against a further Hindu decrease and Muslim increase)[13], but remained far below the Muslim growth rate of 30.85% c.q. 30.90%, so that the effective Hindu percentage decreased (by O.37%). Moreover, this increase was a freak development in a long-term decrease of the Hindu growth rate due to family planning, and was easily undone by a decrease twice as big (to 22.78%) in 1991.[14] <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>3.4. The Muslim growth rate worldwide<BR/><BR/> The same trend as witnessed in India is conspicuous at the international level: Muslim countries are among the champions of demographic growth. The economic explanation for high and low birthrates breaks down when confronted with the figures for Muslim countries: the rich and orthodox Saudi Arabs procreate much faster than the relatively poor but more secularized Turks. <BR/><BR/> The yearbooks of the Encyclopedia Brittannica give a wealth of countrywise data, including the population's doubling‑rate, which is a more accurate indicator of effective demographic growth than the birth rate. It turns out that no Muslim country has a markedly lower growth rate than India. Indonesia, Turkey and Tunisia are at about the same level as India, which is already seen by many as a demographic disaster area itself (doubling in ca. 33 years). It is no coincidence that these are the three most secularized Muslim countries.[15] The more Islamic a country, the higher the birthrate: Iran, Jordan, Lybia, Kuwait and Eritrea double their populations in 20 years or less, up to twice as fast as India.[16] <BR/><BR/> The Arabs are the champions: "In no Arab country does the population increase at a rate lower than 2.5% per year. In practically every Arab country, more than 4 inhabitants in 10 are youngsters below 15."[17] Pakistan is Asia's fastest-growing non-Arab country, doubling its population every 24 years.[18] No country is known to have a higher birth‑rate among non‑Muslims than among Muslims, but countries where the opposite is true are numerous.[19] The starkest differential is probably found in the European countries. Thus, to use another demographic indicator, the percentage of the under-25 age group in Britain is 33 for natives, 48 for Indians (mostly Hindus) and Caribbeans, 60 for Pakistanis and 63 for Bangladeshis.[20] A similar indicator for the Subcontinent: the under-15 constitute 46.3% in Pakistan, 45.1% in Bangladesh, and 35.2% in India.[21] <BR/><BR/> In Belgium, the average native couple (Christian or secular) has 1.7 children, the immigrant Moroccan couple (Muslim) has 3.25 children, i.e. nearly twice as many.[22] About American Islam, a Pakistani observer makes an estimate for the year 2,000: "The US (...) may by then become the 14th or 15th 'largest Islamic country'. Islam, in fact, is the fastest-growing religion in the US". Though the growth is largely due to immigration, he also sees "a higher birth rate" as "a major factor".[23] <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/>3.5. Islamic government policies<BR/><BR/> In Malaysia, where Muslims were only 50% at the time of independence, just enough to declare it an Islamic state, the Government pursues a natalist policy at least as far as the Muslim Malays are concerned (non-Muslims are mostly members of the Chinese and Tamil Hindu minorities). It is only in countries where Muslims are in an overwhelming majority and demographic competition is simply not an issue that Islamic governments and religious leaders, faced with the problems resulting from overpopulation, have made an effort to curb the birth rate. <BR/><BR/> Iran now tries to encourage a three-children-per-family norm, and prides itself on reducing the yearly increase in population to 1.75%, about half of what it was in the 1980s.[24] But this will not markedly curb population growth in absolute figures for the next few decades: "Although the rate of population growth has come down (...) the girls born in response to Khomeini's call for more Muslims will soon reach marrying age; 45.5% of the population is under 15."[25] <BR/><BR/> Given the extremely high birth rate in the generation now growing up to become the fathers and mothers of the next two decades (much more numerous than the generation presently in their twenties and thirties and trying to stick to the three-children-per-family norm), even a two-children-per-family norm would still amount to an impressive demographic growth for two more generations. With a norm of three children per family, Iran is not even pursuing a policy aimed at achieving demographic zero growth, but even if it were, it could only achieve it at a much later date, and at a much higher population level, than countries with a more stringent commitment to demographic responsibility.[26]<BR/><BR/> There is no indication that even one Muslim country will achieve a substantially lower growth rate than India's Hindu community within the next decades.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-24463722784615279062007-04-10T09:02:00.000+05:302007-04-10T09:02:00.000+05:30Since Hindu comments are all 'lies' here's a comme...Since Hindu comments are all 'lies' here's a comment from a Israeli source: <BR/> <BR/><BR/>Israeli Muslim Birth Rate is Double that of Jews<BR/>(February 2003)<BR/><BR/>The Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics reported that Israeli Muslims have a natural reproduction rate that is double that of the Jewish population. The figures, which also include Muslims in East Jerusalem, show that at the beginning of 2003 there were more than one million Muslims in Israel. Almost 40% of the country’s Muslims (400,000 people) live in various communities in the north, the biggest of which is the city of Nazareth, which has 40,000 Muslim residents. Jerusalem has the largest Muslim population, with over 200,000. They make up some 30% of the city’s residents and some 20% of the country’s entire Muslim population. The number of Muslim residents in Israel at the start of 2003 stands at around 1,037,000, about 15% of Israel’s population. According to forecasts, the Muslim population will rise to 1,677,000 people, or 19% of the population, by the end of 2020. Muslims make up 82% of the entire Israeli Arab population, and they will comprise 85% of the Israeli Arab population in 2020. The Muslim population’s average natural rate of increase over the past few years is double that of the Jewish population: 3.6% compared to 1.8%. This rate of increase is one of the highest in the world, even higher than in neighboring Arab countries. Israel’s Muslim population is also young: 42% of Muslims are children under the age of 15, compared with 26% of the Jewish population. The percentage of people over 65 is less than 3% of Muslims, compared with 12% of the Jewish population.<BR/>Source: Yedioth Ahronoth, (February 13, 2003)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-30630550760138995022007-04-10T08:57:00.000+05:302007-04-10T08:57:00.000+05:30As usual the secular people are shocked by a Hindu...As usual the secular people are shocked by a Hindu rant but cannot even bring themselves to address the Islamic and Christian crap being shoveled on them by the truckloads every day. It is obvious that the people of India are good, kind people who have more than tolerated the Muslims and Christians. But that is not enough for the likes of Varadarajan! I wonder when he will convert?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-25384968603692995172007-04-10T01:13:00.000+05:302007-04-10T01:13:00.000+05:30//I hope you would take similar painstaiking effor...//I hope you would take similar painstaiking effort to translate and report some of the phamplets they distribute in churches and some of the excerpts of the mullahs speech on a Juma prayer meeting.<BR/><BR/>//<BR/><BR/>I endorse it. Also please translate minoriy appeasement speech by congress and other pseudo secularists.கால்கரி சிவாhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11676323893190343724noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-418877815204371852007-04-09T22:53:00.000+05:302007-04-09T22:53:00.000+05:30There are far too many bleeding heart liberals and...There are far too many bleeding heart liberals and PC leftists on this forum. but alas this ostrich like approach will not work. Wake up.look around the world and see what is happening. Islamists sre loudly proclaiming to convert the whole world to dar-ul-islam. visit some of the sites run by ex-muslims and get a sampling of the islamic horors. can anybody explain the mentality behind the muslims swearing by secularism when they are in minority and want sharia law as soon as they are in majority. Example any muslim country even seemingly liberal like malaysia.Explain why apostasy is punisable by death in islam. Why no other religon is tolerated in Saudi Arabia while they finance grand mosques all around the world. rejoice you all useful idiots while going is good for it amy not last for ever.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-63302576780693986602007-04-09T22:10:00.000+05:302007-04-09T22:10:00.000+05:30I hope you would take similar painstaiking effort ...I hope you would take similar painstaiking effort to translate and report some of the phamplets they distribute in churches and some of the excerpts of the mullahs speech on a Juma prayer meeting.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-28737553204689208862007-04-09T21:23:00.000+05:302007-04-09T21:23:00.000+05:30I read in a newspaper that the CD is raising conce...I read in a newspaper that the CD is raising concerns about the population rise of muslims in geometric progression.But your translation does not speak about it.So,there is an iota of doubt in your postingsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-30408337525126752202007-04-09T17:24:00.000+05:302007-04-09T17:24:00.000+05:30Shocking. Five years of governance hasn't changed ...Shocking. Five years of governance hasn't changed anything, the core philosophy is driven by hatred. What's with these people?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-46460670577105122112007-04-09T16:42:00.000+05:302007-04-09T16:42:00.000+05:30Sir,All of this true upto certain extent. See our ...Sir,<BR/><BR/>All of this true upto certain extent. See our country's past history and that will explain about Muslim's mentalily. Please don't support them.<BR/><BR/>MaheshAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-34763290250887105572007-04-08T22:58:00.000+05:302007-04-08T22:58:00.000+05:30I am suspicious of your tranlation. In fact I don'...I am suspicious of your tranlation. In fact I don't trust your posts when it comes to BJP or others as you are idelogically aganist them. We know you are honest about 90% of the time but you twist facts remaining 10% of the time.<BR/><BR/>In the past you twisted facts regarding the nuclear deal. You made a statement saying that BJP also wanted the same kind of deal with US even though ABV was not ready to bend the way Manmohan Singh is bending. This type of statements you make as don't want to give any credit to BJP's way of making the deal with US which was superior compared to this UPA administration.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-83826049338111761152007-04-08T11:15:00.000+05:302007-04-08T11:15:00.000+05:30whoever conceived this CD is of sick mentality. Bu...whoever conceived this CD is of sick mentality. But the thing is that the launching of this CD is one thing and there are chances that the office bearers launching this CD were not quite aware of the contents. We can not say at this stage that BJP shpuld be banned. I have seen the leaders of the political parties in times of elections, they normally dont have time to count the currency notes leave aside watching 52 minute CD. It was really irresponsobleof them but cant say if they conceptualised this type of content.Further I dont think that RajNath Singh any day thought that he will go scot free after directing the contents of this CD.Wandererhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08423648202608466838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13437119.post-20676696610220603652007-04-08T02:05:00.000+05:302007-04-08T02:05:00.000+05:30Unfortunately, the BJP is on a roll after Punjab, ...Unfortunately, the BJP is on a roll after Punjab, Uttaranchal and now Delhi. Will it win India by 2009? God save the minorities.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com